Thursday, July 1, 2010
Twilight
Okay, so am I perv for going and spending 8.50 to sit in the dark by myself and watch some seventeen ( or eighteen) kid walk around half naked on the big screen? That's a big hell NO! Let's just say little I could have cared less if there was one vampire in that movie, the werewolves had it going on. All that hard, naked, man flesh was almost too much for an old woman like myself to take. Wrong! I could have watched more. So here's the question, is it a bad thing to drool over Jacob, the werewolf? I mean, I guess I could be his really young and beautiful mom. On the other hand, isn't that what the writer and the producer's are going for? Turning him into a finely sculped, flawless, bronze Native American Adonis. So ladies, let's vote should we drool or not? Objectify the male form in the same way we have strived not be or not? By the way, the movie was okay. Just okay. But, great eye candy.
3 comments:
The way I see it, werewolves are a form of a dog, and therefore we must take in to account that dogs age much more rapidly than humans. 7X as fast to be exact! In fact, if Jacob the werewolf is only a mere, say 16 human years, than in all reality, he is not only technically over the legal age of 18, but he is 112 years old!! Very wise and mature and definitely not jail bate.
Hope this makes you feel better :)
Julie
I say objectify!
I vote for objectify, myself!
Post a Comment